Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

70 F. App'x 120

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2003·No. No. 02-2426·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Martha K. Ball appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-01-359-3-T, 220 F.Supp.2d 698 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Martha K. Ball appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-01-359-3-T, 220 F.Supp.2d 698 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 70 F. App'x 120 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

70 F. App'x 120 (Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related