Ball v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ball v. State

262 S.W. 1052, 98 Tex. Crim. 52, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 475

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 28, 1924·No. No. 8589.·Published

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Charged by indictment with the offense of- assault with a prohibited weapon, appellant entered a plea of guilty, and the jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

*53 The record is accompanied by no statement of facts; nor is there complaint by bill of exceptions or otherwise of any ruling of the trial court, or fault in the trial of the case. The indictment is not attacked, nor have we observed in it any vice. So far as we are able t-discern from the record, the conviction is reguiar, and this court has no choice but to enter a judgment of affirmance. Such is the order.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Charged by indictment with the offense of- assault with a prohibited weapon, appellant entered a plea of guilty, and the jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

*53 The record is accompanied by no statement of facts; nor is there complaint by bill of exceptions or otherwise of any ruling of the trial court, or fault in the trial of the case. The indictment is not attacked, nor have we observed in it any vice. So far as we are able t-discern from the record, the conviction is reguiar, and this court has no choice but to enter a judgment of affirmance. Such is the order.

Affirmed.

Ball v. State, 262 S.W. 1052, 98 Tex. Crim. 52, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 475 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

262 S.W. 1052 (Ball v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.