Ball v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ball v. State

1911 OK CR 340, 115 P. 1125, 6 Okla. Crim. 600, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 278

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 23, 1911

DocketNo. A-596.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 340 (Ball v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ball v. State, 1911 OK CR 340, 115 P. 1125, 6 Okla. Crim. 600, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 278 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant .was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50, and a confinement of 30 days in the county jail. No appearance has been made for appellant in this court. What purports to be the ease-made, does not contain a statement of the evidence introduced in the lower court. We find no error in the information, the instructions of the court, or the judgment. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant .was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50, and a confinement of 30 days in the county jail. No appearance has been made for appellant in this court. What purports to be the ease-made, does not contain a statement of the evidence introduced in the lower court. We find no error in the information, the instructions of the court, or the judgment. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 340, 115 P. 1125, 6 Okla. Crim. 600, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.