Ball v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ball v. State

1911 OK CR 340, 115 P. 1125, 6 Okla. Crim. 600, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 278

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 23, 1911·No. No. A-596.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant .was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50, and a confinement of 30 days in the county jail. No appearance has been made for appellant in this court. What purports to be the ease-made, does not contain a statement of the evidence introduced in the lower court. We find no error in the information, the instructions of the court, or the judgment. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant .was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50, and a confinement of 30 days in the county jail. No appearance has been made for appellant in this court. What purports to be the ease-made, does not contain a statement of the evidence introduced in the lower court. We find no error in the information, the instructions of the court, or the judgment. The judgment of the lower court is, therefore, affirmed.

Ball v. State, 1911 OK CR 340, 115 P. 1125, 6 Okla. Crim. 600, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 278 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK CR 340 (Ball v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.