Ball v. State
This text of 61 N.Y.2d 990 (Ball v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
opinion of the court
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), orders of reversal affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memoranda at the Appellate Division (96 AD2d 1139, 1140). The Appellate Division order dismissing claimant’s appeal from the nonfinal Court of Claims order dated September 27, 1982 is treated as one of affirmance (see, e.g., Matter of Town of Islip [Mascioli], 49 NY2d 354, 358, n 1); and the appeal from that order is dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.Y.2d 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-state-ny-1984.