Ball v. State

61 N.Y.2d 990
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 27, 1984
DocketAppeal No. 1. Claim No. 62167; Appeal No. 2. Claim No. 62168; Appeal No. 3. Claim No. 62169
StatusPublished

This text of 61 N.Y.2d 990 (Ball v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ball v. State, 61 N.Y.2d 990 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

opinion of the court

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), orders of reversal affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memoranda at the Appellate Division (96 AD2d 1139, 1140). The Appellate Division order dismissing claimant’s appeal from the nonfinal Court of Claims order dated September 27, 1982 is treated as one of affirmance (see, e.g., Matter of Town of Islip [Mascioli], 49 NY2d 354, 358, n 1); and the appeal from that order is dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Town of Islip
402 N.E.2d 1123 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Ball v. State
96 A.D.2d 1139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.Y.2d 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-state-ny-1984.