Ball v. State

7 Blackf. 242, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 113
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 7 Blackf. 242 (Ball v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ball v. State, 7 Blackf. 242, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 113 (Ind. 1844).

Opinion

Blackford, J.

— Indictment against a person for suffering certain unlawful games with cards for brandy, money, &c., to be played in his grocery. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the state.

This indictment does not give the names of the persons who played, nor does it state their names to be unknown. It is for that omission bad, according to the principle on which the cases of Butler v. The State, 5 Blackf. 280, and The State v. Irvin, Id. 343, were decided.

Per Curiam.

— The judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walters v. State
92 N.E. 537 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
McLaughlin v. State
45 Ind. 338 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Sowle v. State
11 Ind. 492 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)
Groner v. State
6 Fla. 39 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1855)
Clark v. State
19 Ala. 552 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Blackf. 242, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-state-ind-1844.