Ball v. State
7 Blackf. 242, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 113
Opinion
— Indictment against a person for suffering certain unlawful games with cards for brandy, money, &c., to be played in his grocery. Plea, not guilty. Verdict and judgment for the state.
This indictment does not give the names of the persons who played, nor does it state their names to be unknown. It is for that omission bad, according to the principle on which the cases of Butler v. The State, 5 Blackf. 280, and The State v. Irvin, Id. 343, were decided.
— The judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ball v. State, 7 Blackf. 242, 1844 Ind. LEXIS 113 (Ind. 1844).
7 Blackf. 242 (Ball v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walters v. State
92 N.E. 537 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)
McLaughlin v. State
45 Ind. 338 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Sowle v. State
11 Ind. 492 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)
Groner v. State
6 Fla. 39 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1855)
Clark v. State
19 Ala. 552 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)