Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ball v. State

Ball v. State

243 S.E.2d 672, 145 Ga. App. 254, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1939
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 10, 1978·No. 55273·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for rape. Held:

There is no merit in the defendant’s enumeration of error complaining of the admission of certain evidence over objections which were too general for consideration. Farmer v. State, 94 Ga. App. 475 (95 SE2d 321); McGahee v. State, 133 Ga. App. 964, 967 (213 SE2d 91). Moreover, "Questions of the relevancy of evidence are for the court... when facts are such that the jury, if permitted to hear them, may or may not make an inference pertinent to the issue, according to the view which they may take of them, in connection with the other facts in evidence, they are such that the jury ought to be permitted to hear them.” Garner v. State, 83 Ga. App. 178, 184 (63 SE2d 225).

Judgment affirmed.

Webb and McMurray, JJ., concur. *255 Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ball v. State, 243 S.E.2d 672, 145 Ga. App. 254, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1939 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

243 S.E.2d 672 (Ball v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
420 S.E.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Worth v. State
358 S.E.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Thomas v. State
328 S.E.2d 422 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Wireman v. State
295 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Hines v. Good Housekeeping Shop
291 S.E.2d 238 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Bearden v. State
285 S.E.2d 606 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Calhoun v. Branan
253 S.E.2d 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Johnson v. State
252 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)