Ball v. State

664 So. 2d 1176, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13505, 1995 WL 759138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ball v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 651 So. 2d 1224
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 1995·No. No. 95-0250·Published

Opinion

HENNING, PATTI ENGLANDER, Associate Judge.

Appellant was charged with sexual battery on a child under the age of twelve. At trial he entered a plea of nolo contendere to the lesser included offense of a lewd and lascivious act on a child under the age of sixteen. He now appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence.

This Court finds no merit to Appellant’s claim that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea and hereby affirms that portion of the judgment and sentence.

However, as the state concedes, the Judgment and Sentence, orders of probation and community control must be corrected to reflect that the assessment to the Crime Compensation Fund should only be $50.00 in accordance with section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1993).

Accordingly, the case is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded to the trial court to correct the cost assessments on the various orders.

[1177]*1177AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and POLEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ball v. State, 664 So. 2d 1176, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13505, 1995 WL 759138 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

664 So. 2d 1176 (Ball v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.