Ball v. Ramparts, LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

WILLIAM H. BALL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01754-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), gly. ORDER 91 RAMPARTS, LLC, 10 Defendant(s). 11 It appears that Plaintiff William H. Ball has failed to update his address. Docket No. 10. 12] “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in 13] his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 14] 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately 15] file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to 16] do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 18] February 25, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: February 6, 2025 . 22 23 Unite Sees, gistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28