Ball v. Ramparts, LLC
This text of Ball v. Ramparts, LLC (Ball v. Ramparts, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
WILLIAM H. BALL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01754-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), gly. ORDER 91 RAMPARTS, LLC, 10 Defendant(s). 11 It appears that Plaintiff William H. Ball has failed to update his address. Docket No. 10. 12] “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in 13] his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 14] 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately 15] file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to 16] do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 18] February 25, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: February 6, 2025 . 22 23 Unite Sees, gistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ball v. Ramparts, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-ramparts-llc-nvd-2025.