Ball v. Nye

99 Mass. 582
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by38 cases

This text of 99 Mass. 582 (Ball v. Nye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ball v. Nye, 99 Mass. 582 (Mass. 1868).

Opinion

Foster, J.

To suffer filthy water from a vault to percolate or filter through the soil into the land of a contiguous proprietor, to the injury of his well and cellar, where it is done habitually and within the knowledge of the party who maintains the vault, whether it passes above ground or below, is of itself an actionable tort. Under such circumstances the reasonable precaution which the law requires is, effectually to exclude the filth from the neighbor’s land; and not to do so is of itself negligence. In the present instance, there was no pretence of a sudden and unavoidable accident which could not have been foreseen or guarded against by due care. The percolations appear to have been constant, and their existence to have been known to the defendant. The instructions asked for by his counsel were liable to mislead the jury, and those given were exactly accurate and appropriate to the case. Baird v. Williamson, 15 C. B. (N. S.) 376. Rylands v. Fletcher, Law Rep. 3 H. L. 330.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anderson v. W.R. Grace & Co.
628 F. Supp. 1219 (D. Massachusetts, 1986)
United States v. Fmc Corporation
572 F.2d 902 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Cities Service Company v. State
312 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
The Clark-Aiken Co. v. Cromwell-Wright Co. Inc.
323 N.E.2d 876 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
North Little Rock Transportation Co. v. Finkbeiner
420 S.W.2d 874 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1967)
Deyo v. Athol Housing Authority
140 N.E.2d 393 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1957)
Central Expl. Co., Inc. v. Gray, Et Ux.
70 So. 2d 33 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954)
Reynolds v. W. H. Hinman Co.
75 A.2d 802 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1950)
Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.
186 A. 629 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1936)
Kaufman v. Boston Dye House, Inc.
182 N.E. 297 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Healey v. Citizens Gas & Electric Co.
201 N.W. 118 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Schindler v. Standard Oil Co.
232 S.W. 735 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1921)
Florida Power Co. v. Cason
84 So. 921 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Pearl v. Whitcomb
229 Mass. 181 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Louden v. City of Cincinnati
90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 144 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1914)
Weaver Mercantile Co. v. Thurmond
70 S.E. 126 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1911)
Ainsworth v. Lakin
57 L.R.A. 132 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Davis v. Rich
62 N.E. 375 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Adams Hotel Co. v. Cobb
53 S.W. 478 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1899)
Commonwealth v. Yost
11 Pa. Super. 323 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 Mass. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-nye-mass-1868.