Ball v. Mann Commission Co.
50 S.W.2d 1090, 121 Tex. 495, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 140
Opinion
We have dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction because we believe the Court of Civil Appeals properly reversed and remanded this cause for another trial. [48 S.W.(2d) 780.] We do not pass upon the question as to whether defendant in error is entitled to maintain this suit if its right to do business has been forfeited for nonpayment of franchise tax, because the application for writ of error contains no assignment presenting such question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ball v. Mann Commission Co., 50 S.W.2d 1090, 121 Tex. 495, 1932 Tex. LEXIS 140 (Tex. 1932).
50 S.W.2d 1090 (Ball v. Mann Commission Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mann Commission Co. v. Ball
48 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)