Ball v. Mann Commission Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Ball v. Mann Commission Co.

121 Tex. 495

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedMay 21, 1932

DocketApp. No. 18761

StatusPublished

This text of 121 Tex. 495 (Ball v. Mann Commission Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ball v. Mann Commission Co., 121 Tex. 495 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction because we believe the Court of Civil Appeals properly reversed and remanded this cause for another trial. We do not pass upon the question as to whether defendant in error is entitled to maintain this suit if its right to do business has been forfeited for non-payment of franchise tax, because the application for writ of error contains no assignment presenting such question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have dismissed this cause for want of jurisdiction because we believe the Court of Civil Appeals properly reversed and remanded this cause for another trial. We do not pass upon the question as to whether defendant in error is entitled to maintain this suit if its right to do business has been forfeited for non-payment of franchise tax, because the application for writ of error contains no assignment presenting such question.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 Tex. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-mann-commission-co-tex-1932.