Ball v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ball v. Goord

282 A.D.2d 800, 722 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 800 (Ball v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ball v. Goord, 282 A.D.2d 800, 722 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

[801]*801Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges a determination that he be placed in administrative segregation for his involvement in organizing a food fight. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

[801]*801Petitioner, a prison inmate, challenges a determination that he be placed in administrative segregation for his involvement in organizing a food fight. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D.2d 800, 722 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-goord-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack