Ball & Co. v. Van Riper

Supreme Court of Iowa

Ball & Co. v. Van Riper

37 N.W. 120, 74 Iowa 146, 1887 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 468

DecidedMarch 10, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 37 N.W. 120 (Ball & Co. v. Van Riper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ball & Co. v. Van Riper, 37 N.W. 120, 74 Iowa 146, 1887 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 468 (iowa 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Seevers, 0. J.

The amount in controversy is less than one hundred dollars, and the certificate of the trial judge is as follows: “At the request of the defendants, the court certified the following questions of law, on which it is desirable to have the opinion of the supreme court.” It will be observed that the certificate fails to state that the questions certified are involved in the cause, and it is, therefore, insufficient. Van Sickle v. Downs, 72 Iowa, 624. The appeal must be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seevers, 0. J.

The amount in controversy is less than one hundred dollars, and the certificate of the trial judge is as follows: “At the request of the defendants, the court certified the following questions of law, on which it is desirable to have the opinion of the supreme court.” It will be observed that the certificate fails to state that the questions certified are involved in the cause, and it is, therefore, insufficient. Van Sickle v. Downs, 72 Iowa, 624. The appeal must be

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 N.W. 120, 74 Iowa 146, 1887 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-co-v-van-riper-iowa-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack