Ball Bros. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division

Indiana Supreme Court

Ball Bros. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division

167 N.E.2d 469, 240 Ind. 582, 1960 Ind. LEXIS 228

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedJune 6, 1960

Docket29,922

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 167 N.E.2d 469 (Ball Bros. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ball Bros. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, 167 N.E.2d 469, 240 Ind. 582, 1960 Ind. LEXIS 228 (Ind. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Achor, J.

The actions herein consolidated for hearing are claims for unemployment benefits under the Indiana Employment Security Act, beginning with §52-1525, Burns’ 1951 Repl. [being Acts 1947, ch. 208, §101, p. 673.]

This case was transferred from the Appellate Court under provisions of §4-209, Burns’ 1946 Repl. [Acts 1901, ch. 247, §15, p. 565], wherein a majority of the entire court en banc failed to concur.

As is true in an “appeal” from an order of the Industrial Board or the Public Service Commission, the “appeal” provided by §52-1557g, Burns’ 1951 Repl. [1959 Cum. Supp.], is not an appeal in fact, but is rather a “judicial review” of the decision of the order of the Employment Security Board by the Appellate Court. Theréfore, the Appellate Court is the court of exclusive original jurisdictional review in such cases and this court has no jurisdiction to accept transfer under §4-209, Burns’ 1946 Repl. Graver Tank & Mfg. *584 Co. v. Maher (1958), 238 Ind. 226, 229, 150 N. E. 2d 254; Sizemore v. Public Service Commission of Ind. (1960), 240 Ind. 513, 167 N. E. 2d 343.

This cause is remanded to the Appellate Court, with instructions to continue it to the next term of that court, and, if then, a. majority: of the judges cannot agree, judgment shall be affirmed under the procedure and in the manner provided in §2-3232, Burns’ 1946 Repl. [being Acts 1881 (Spec. Sess.), ch. 38, §654, p. 240]. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Maher, supra.

Jackson, C. J., Arterburn, Bobbitt and Landis, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 167 N. E. 2d 469.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Achor, J.

The actions herein consolidated for hearing are claims for unemployment benefits under the Indiana Employment Security Act, beginning with §52-1525, Burns’ 1951 Repl. [being Acts 1947, ch. 208, §101, p. 673.]

This case was transferred from the Appellate Court under provisions of §4-209, Burns’ 1946 Repl. [Acts 1901, ch. 247, §15, p. 565], wherein a majority of the entire court en banc failed to concur.

As is true in an “appeal” from an order of the Industrial Board or the Public Service Commission, the “appeal” provided by §52-1557g, Burns’ 1951 Repl. [1959 Cum. Supp.], is not an appeal in fact, but is rather a “judicial review” of the decision of the order of the Employment Security Board by the Appellate Court. Theréfore, the Appellate Court is the court of exclusive original jurisdictional review in such cases and this court has no jurisdiction to accept transfer under §4-209, Burns’ 1946 Repl. Graver Tank & Mfg. *584 Co. v. Maher (1958), 238 Ind. 226, 229, 150 N. E. 2d 254; Sizemore v. Public Service Commission of Ind. (1960), 240 Ind. 513, 167 N. E. 2d 343.

This cause is remanded to the Appellate Court, with instructions to continue it to the next term of that court, and, if then, a. majority: of the judges cannot agree, judgment shall be affirmed under the procedure and in the manner provided in §2-3232, Burns’ 1946 Repl. [being Acts 1881 (Spec. Sess.), ch. 38, §654, p. 240]. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Maher, supra.

Jackson, C. J., Arterburn, Bobbitt and Landis, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported in 167 N. E. 2d 469.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 N.E.2d 469, 240 Ind. 582, 1960 Ind. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-bros-v-review-board-of-indiana-employment-security-division-ind-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack