Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BALKRISHNA SETTY, individually and as No. 18-35573 general partner in Shrinivas Sugandhalaya Partnership with Nagraj Setty; SHRINIVAS D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01146-RAJ SUGANDHALAYA (BNG) LLP, Western District of Washington, Seattle Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER WITHDRAWING v. OPINION
SHRINIVAS SUGANDHALAYA LLP,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: D.W. NELSON, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The opinion filed January 20, 2021, and appearing at 986 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir.
2021), is withdrawn. It may not be cited by or to this court or any district court of
the Ninth Circuit. A new disposition will be filed in due course. Accordingly,
appellant Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP’s petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED
as moot. Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc
may be filed following the filing of a new disposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
998 F.3d 897 (Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.