Balke-Reamer-Balke Co. v. Nicholi

North Dakota Supreme Court

Balke-Reamer-Balke Co. v. Nicholi

134 N.W. 1134, 22 N.D. 548, 1912 N.D. LEXIS 49

DecidedJanuary 29, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 134 N.W. 1134 (Balke-Reamer-Balke Co. v. Nicholi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balke-Reamer-Balke Co. v. Nicholi, 134 N.W. 1134, 22 N.D. 548, 1912 N.D. LEXIS 49 (N.D. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:.

This case was tried in the county court with increased jurisdiction of Bottineau county, and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Erom such judgment the defendant appealed to the district court of Bottineau county, wherein a verdict and judgment were rendered against him and in favor of the [549]*549plaintiff. From such judgment tbe defendant has appealed to this court.

The respondent has served and filed an offer to accept, in full settlement of the amount claimed, the amount of the judgment rendered in county court. The defendant and appellant appears in open court and states that he makes no objection to such disposition of this case.

It is accordingly ordered that the appeal be dismissed, and the District Court of Bottineau county is directed to enter judgment in conformity with the judgment of the County Court of that county, from which the appeal was originally taken.

Goss, J., being disqualified, did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:.

This case was tried in the county court with increased jurisdiction of Bottineau county, and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Erom such judgment the defendant appealed to the district court of Bottineau county, wherein a verdict and judgment were rendered against him and in favor of the [549]*549plaintiff. From such judgment tbe defendant has appealed to this court.

The respondent has served and filed an offer to accept, in full settlement of the amount claimed, the amount of the judgment rendered in county court. The defendant and appellant appears in open court and states that he makes no objection to such disposition of this case.

It is accordingly ordered that the appeal be dismissed, and the District Court of Bottineau county is directed to enter judgment in conformity with the judgment of the County Court of that county, from which the appeal was originally taken.

Goss, J., being disqualified, did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 N.W. 1134, 22 N.D. 548, 1912 N.D. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balke-reamer-balke-co-v-nicholi-nd-1912.