Balkcom v. State

591 So. 2d 680, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 678, 1992 WL 10909
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 15, 1992
DocketNo. 90-2209
StatusPublished

This text of 591 So. 2d 680 (Balkcom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balkcom v. State, 591 So. 2d 680, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 678, 1992 WL 10909 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The challenged judgment of conviction is affirmed. Although the court orally sentenced the appellant to a specific term of imprisonment, the written sentencing order does not recite the length of the sentence. This case is accordingly remanded for correction of the omission in the sentencing order.

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
591 So. 2d 680, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 678, 1992 WL 10909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balkcom-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.