Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance

81 A.2d 9, 7 N.J. 152, 1951 N.J. LEXIS 206
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 21, 1951·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

*153 Per Curiam.

The record indicates the testimony in question was willfully and purposely false and substantially affected the results.

It would manifestly be unjust to permit the judgment to' stand under these circumstances.

We are in accord with the determination made by the Appellate Division and subscribe to the reasons expressed in its opinion.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance, 81 A.2d 9, 7 N.J. 152, 1951 N.J. LEXIS 206 (N.J. 1951).

81 A.2d 9 (Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilgallon v. Bond
652 A.2d 753 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.
792 P.2d 815 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1990)
Forrest v. Forrest
574 A.2d 1004 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Willis v. Willis
460 P.2d 396 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1969)
Hodgson v. Applegate
149 A.2d 839 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)
Hintenberger v. Garfield
139 A.2d 328 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Pizzi v. Baker
91 A.2d 357 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)