Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance
This text of 81 A.2d 9 (Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record indicates the testimony in question was willfully and purposely false and substantially affected the results.
It would manifestly be unjust to permit the judgment to' stand under these circumstances.
We are in accord with the determination made by the Appellate Division and subscribe to the reasons expressed in its opinion.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A.2d 9, 7 N.J. 152, 1951 N.J. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balip-automotive-repairs-inc-v-atlantic-casualty-insurance-nj-1951.