Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance
Opinion
The record indicates the testimony in question was willfully and purposely false and substantially affected the results.
It would manifestly be unjust to permit the judgment to' stand under these circumstances.
We are in accord with the determination made by the Appellate Division and subscribe to the reasons expressed in its opinion.
The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Waoheneeld, Burling and Ackerson—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
81 A.2d 9 (Balip Automotive Repairs, Inc. v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.