Balint v. Carson City

152 F.3d 1223
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 8, 1998·No. 96-17342·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

152 F.3d 1223

98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7053

Lisette BALINT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CARSON CITY, NEVADA, a consolidated municipality; Rod
Banister, in his official capacity only as Carson City
Sheriff; Kay Bennett, Tom Tatro, Janice Ayres, Greg Smith,
in their official capacities only as Board of Supervisors,
Carson City, Nevada, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-17342.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1998.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Balint v. Carson City, 144 F.3d 1225, 1226 (9th Cir.1998), is withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balint v. Carson City, 152 F.3d 1223 (9th Cir. 1998).

152 F.3d 1223 (Balint v. Carson City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kalsi v. New York City Transit Authority
62 F. Supp. 2d 745 (E.D. New York, 1998)