Balikes v. Speleos

Supreme Court of Florida

Balikes v. Speleos

193 So. 2d 434

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 6, 1967

DocketNo. 34456

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 193 So. 2d 434 (Balikes v. Speleos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balikes v. Speleos, 193 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Through petition for writ of certiorari, there has been presented before us for review, a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 173 So.2d 735, affirming the judgment of the circuit court in its granting of rule absolute in prohibition. We issued the writ, and the cause was argued both on jurisdiction and on the merits. After having heard oral argument and having considered the petition, the record, and the briefs of the parties, we have concluded that this court is without jurisdiction to review the cause, there being no direct conflict as required by the Constitution of Florida, Article V, Section 4(2), F.S.A. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari which we have previously issued is discharged and the cause dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and KANNER (Retired), District Court Judge, concur. ERVIN, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Through petition for writ of certiorari, there has been presented before us for review, a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 173 So.2d 735, affirming the judgment of the circuit court in its granting of rule absolute in prohibition. We issued the writ, and the cause was argued both on jurisdiction and on the merits. After having heard oral argument and having considered the petition, the record, and the briefs of the parties, we have concluded that this court is without jurisdiction to review the cause, there being no direct conflict as required by the Constitution of Florida, Article V, Section 4(2), F.S.A. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari which we have previously issued is discharged and the cause dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and KANNER (Retired), District Court Judge, concur. ERVIN, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 2d 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balikes-v-speleos-fla-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack