Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co.

293 N.W. 892, 294 Mich. 639, 1940 Mich. LEXIS 802

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 1940

DocketDocket No. 39, Calendar No. 40,722.

StatusPublished

This text of 293 N.W. 892 (Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balicki v. New York Cent. R. Co., 293 N.W. 892, 294 Mich. 639, 1940 Mich. LEXIS 802 (Mich. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

This suit arose out of the same accident as Perch v. RailroadCo., ante, 227. The controlling facts and applicable law are the same in the two cases. In the Perch Case on rehearing a majority of the court held that under the record the defendant was entitled as a matter of law to judgment in its favor. Accordingly judgment for defendant by direction of the trial judge in the instant case must be affirmed. Costs to appellee.

BUSHNELL, C.J., and SHARPE, BOYLES, CHANDLER, McALLISTER, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. *Page 640

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This suit arose out of the same accident as Perch v. RailroadCo., ante, 227. The controlling facts and applicable law are the same in the two cases. In the Perch Case on rehearing a majority of the court held that under the record the defendant was entitled as a matter of law to judgment in its favor. Accordingly judgment for defendant by direction of the trial judge in the instant case must be affirmed. Costs to appellee.

BUSHNELL, C.J., and SHARPE, BOYLES, CHANDLER, McALLISTER, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. *Page 640

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 N.W. 892, 294 Mich. 639, 1940 Mich. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balicki-v-new-york-cent-r-co-mich-1940.