Balicki v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

150 F.2d 402, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3300
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 13, 1945·No. Nos. 8926, 8904·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Madlyn Balicki brought suit as the widow and administratrix of Anthony Balicki against Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., of New York, and procured a verdict awarding her damages both as a widow and as administratrix against the defendant. The defendant moved for judgment n. o. v. and, in the alternative, for a new trial. The court below entered an order denying the defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. but granted a new trial. Both the plaintiff and the defendant have appealed. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal, but the plaintiff has filed no motion in respect to the defendant’s appeal. This court is without jurisdiction to hear either appeal in view of the fact that no final judgment has been entered by the court below. See Frank Mercantile Corporation v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 3 Cir., 115 F.2d 496.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the appeal at No. 8926 will be granted and the appeal will be dismissed. The court sua sponte will dismiss the defendant’s appeal at No. 8904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balicki v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc., 150 F.2d 402, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 3300 (3d Cir. 1945).

150 F.2d 402 (Balicki v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Archie's Steak House, Inc. v. Joe Rosenthal & Sons, Inc.
270 N.W.2d 591 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Helen Tsoleas v. Claudia F. Hege
250 F.2d 127 (Fourth Circuit, 1957)
Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.
185 F.2d 531 (Sixth Circuit, 1950)
Tye v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.
173 F.2d 317 (Third Circuit, 1949)