Baliba v. Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baliba v. Michael

1 A.D.2d 847, 149 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6188

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 847 (Baliba v. Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baliba v. Michael, 1 A.D.2d 847, 149 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for an accounting, to recover for professional services, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss for insufficiency the first and second causes of action contained in the complaint, and to strike from the complaint paragraphs “ Twenty-sixth ” and “ Thirty-fourth ” as irrelevant and redundant, and as tending to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action, pursuant to rules 106 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, respectively. Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph the words “in all respects denied” and by substituting in lieu thereof the words “ granted to the extent of striking out paragraph 1 Thirty-fourth ’ and is in all other respects denied.” As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent. In our opinion, the incorporation by reference of the first and second causes of action into the third cause for professional services is improper. Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for an accounting, to recover for professional services, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss for insufficiency the first and second causes of action contained in the complaint, and to strike from the complaint paragraphs “ Twenty-sixth ” and “ Thirty-fourth ” as irrelevant and redundant, and as tending to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the action, pursuant to rules 106 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, respectively. Order modified by striking from the ordering paragraph the words “in all respects denied” and by substituting in lieu thereof the words “ granted to the extent of striking out paragraph 1 Thirty-fourth ’ and is in all other respects denied.” As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent. In our opinion, the incorporation by reference of the first and second causes of action into the third cause for professional services is improper. Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 847, 149 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baliba-v-michael-nyappdiv-1956.