Balfour v. Eves

Idaho Supreme Court

Balfour v. Eves

42 P. 508, 4 Idaho 488, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 50

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 20, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 P. 508 (Balfour v. Eves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balfour v. Eves, 42 P. 508, 4 Idaho 488, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 50 (Idaho 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment, and from an order made after judgment refusing to open the default, entered against the defendants, and refusing to vacate and set aside the judgment.

The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal from said order on the ground that said appeal was not taken in time. The order refusing to set aside the default and judgment were made and entered on the eighth day of November, 1894, and the appeal taken on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1895. This being an order made after final judgment, the appeal, to be effectual, must have been taken within sixty days after the order was made, and entered on the minutes of the court, or filed with [490]*490the clerk. (See Rev. Stats., sec. 4807.) As that was not done, the appeal from the order was not taken in time, and must be dismissed.

This leaves for consideration, the appeal from the judgment, which is here on the judgment-roll alone; and, as we find no error on the face of the record, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed; and it is so ordered, with costs in favor of respondents.

Morgan, C. J., and Huston, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SULLIVAN, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment, and from an order made after judgment refusing to open the default, entered against the defendants, and refusing to vacate and set aside the judgment.

The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal from said order on the ground that said appeal was not taken in time. The order refusing to set aside the default and judgment were made and entered on the eighth day of November, 1894, and the appeal taken on the twenty-seventh day of June, 1895. This being an order made after final judgment, the appeal, to be effectual, must have been taken within sixty days after the order was made, and entered on the minutes of the court, or filed with [490]*490the clerk. (See Rev. Stats., sec. 4807.) As that was not done, the appeal from the order was not taken in time, and must be dismissed.

This leaves for consideration, the appeal from the judgment, which is here on the judgment-roll alone; and, as we find no error on the face of the record, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed; and it is so ordered, with costs in favor of respondents.

Morgan, C. J., and Huston, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 P. 508, 4 Idaho 488, 1895 Ida. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balfour-v-eves-idaho-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack