Balfour Guthrie Co. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 446, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 338
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Balfour Guthrie Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Cust. Ct. 223
United States Customs Court·Decided May 5, 1953·No. No. 57308; protest 888067-G (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When this case was called for trial, it was submitted on the same basis as the submission in Abstract 57282, namely, that the right to move to reopen or to set aside the submission was abandoned. An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled. [447]*447(T. M. Duche & Sons v. United States, 39 C. C. P. A. 186, C. A. D. 485, certiorari denied, T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 344 U. S. 830, followed.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balfour Guthrie Co. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 446, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 338 (cusc 1953).

30 Cust. Ct. 446 (Balfour Guthrie Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc. v. United States
344 U.S. 830 (Supreme Court, 1952)