Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 278, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Cust. Ct. 202
United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1949·No. No. 52996; protests 124427-K, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 278, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1458 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 278 (Balfour Guthrie & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)