Balfe v. Gulf Oil Co.-Latin America

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Balfe v. Gulf Oil Co.-Latin America

293 So. 2d 82, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 16, 1974

DocketNo. 72-411

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 293 So. 2d 82 (Balfe v. Gulf Oil Co.-Latin America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balfe v. Gulf Oil Co.-Latin America, 293 So. 2d 82, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, who was the defendant below, filed this appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. The action was based on a written guaranty by the defendant. The guaranty related to a loan by the plaintiff to Dade Drydock Corporation, of which the defendant was the president. The evidence before the court on the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment showed that the principal amount for which judgment was entered against the defendant was advanced under the loan agreement to or for the benefit of the borrower corporation, and that such advances were made pursuant to the loan agreement upon written requests of the borrower signed by its president, the defendant; that the sums so advanced were unpaid and in default; and that the defendant’s guaranty was applicable thereto. We have given careful consideration to the appellant’s contentions on appeal, and are impelled to conclude that no reason in law has been shown for reversal of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, who was the defendant below, filed this appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. The action was based on a written guaranty by the defendant. The guaranty related to a loan by the plaintiff to Dade Drydock Corporation, of which the defendant was the president. The evidence before the court on the hearing on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment showed that the principal amount for which judgment was entered against the defendant was advanced under the loan agreement to or for the benefit of the borrower corporation, and that such advances were made pursuant to the loan agreement upon written requests of the borrower signed by its president, the defendant; that the sums so advanced were unpaid and in default; and that the defendant’s guaranty was applicable thereto. We have given careful consideration to the appellant’s contentions on appeal, and are impelled to conclude that no reason in law has been shown for reversal of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 So. 2d 82, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balfe-v-gulf-oil-co-latin-america-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack