Balezos v. Saul Lerner Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Balezos v. Saul Lerner Management Corp.

270 A.D.2d 373, 705 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2979

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 20, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 373 (Balezos v. Saul Lerner Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balezos v. Saul Lerner Management Corp., 270 A.D.2d 373, 705 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2979 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Saul Lerner Management Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated April 21, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Fragala Landscape Contracting Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Fragala Landscape Contracting Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing all cross claims insofar as asserted against it (see, Oppenheim v One School St. Professional Corp., 263 AD2d 472; Miranti v Brightwaters Racquet & Spa, 246 AD2d 518; Keshavarz v Murphy, 242 AD2d 680). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Saul Lerner Management Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated April 21, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Fragala Landscape Contracting Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Fragala Landscape Contracting Corp. which was for summary judgment dismissing all cross claims insofar as asserted against it (see, Oppenheim v One School St. Professional Corp., 263 AD2d 472; Miranti v Brightwaters Racquet & Spa, 246 AD2d 518; Keshavarz v Murphy, 242 AD2d 680). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D.2d 373, 705 N.Y.S.2d 263, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balezos-v-saul-lerner-management-corp-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack