Balex Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Balex Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 262

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1955

DocketNo. 59325; protest 216882-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 262 (Balex Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balex Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 262 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

[263]*263Opinion by

La whence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of zinc in sheets, not coated or plated with nickel, or other metal, or gold, silver, or platinum, or any solutions; that said ^inc sheets are articles of which metal is the component material of chief value, other than ores, concentrates, or crude metal; that the merchandise was imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that there had been compliance with the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra, requiring submission of proof of such use in remanufacture by melting. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, as amended by Public Law 66, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[263]*263Opinion by

La whence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of zinc in sheets, not coated or plated with nickel, or other metal, or gold, silver, or platinum, or any solutions; that said ^inc sheets are articles of which metal is the component material of chief value, other than ores, concentrates, or crude metal; that the merchandise was imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that there had been compliance with the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra, requiring submission of proof of such use in remanufacture by melting. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, as amended by Public Law 66, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Cust. Ct. 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balex-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.