Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

285 A.D. 835, 137 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5740
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 A.D. 794

Opinion

Plaintiff in an action to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution was granted a preference on the ground that he had incurred great expense and indebtedness as a result of the confinement of his wife for mental illness in private institutions. Defendants appeal from the order granting the preference. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to each appellant filing a separate brief, and motion [836]*836denied, without costs. The granting of the motion under the facts disclosed in this record was an improvident exercise of discretion. Concededly plaintiff is gainfully employed at a salary in excess of $100 a week. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 285 A.D. 835, 137 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 835 (Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.