Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Opinion
Plaintiff in an action to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution was granted a preference on the ground that he had incurred great expense and indebtedness as a result of the confinement of his wife for mental illness in private institutions. Defendants appeal from the order granting the preference. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to each appellant filing a separate brief, and motion [836]*836denied, without costs. The granting of the motion under the facts disclosed in this record was an improvident exercise of discretion. Concededly plaintiff is gainfully employed at a salary in excess of $100 a week. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
285 A.D. 835 (Balestrero v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.