Bales v. Mitchem
1924 OK 788, 229 P. 561, 103 Okla. 78, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 243
Opinion
Opinion by
Upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, the cause is reversed and remanded for new trial for failure of defendant in error to comply with Rule 7 of this court.
Ifj is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bales v. Mitchem, 1924 OK 788, 229 P. 561, 103 Okla. 78, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 243 (Okla. 1924).
1924 OK 788 (Bales v. Mitchem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Prairie Cotton Oil Co.
1937 OK 478 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Levy v. Nellis
1 N.E.2d 251 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Earlsboro Gas Co. v. Vern H. Brown Drilling Co.
1935 OK 1198 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Hayden Plan Co. v. Wood
275 P. 248 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)