Bales v. Griffin
59 S.E. 316, 3 Ga. App. 97, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 564
Opinion
The finding in favor of the plaintiffs being authorized by the evidence in their behalf, the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed. Crankshaw v. Schweizer Mfg. Co., 1 Ga. App. 363 (58 S. E. 222). The grant of a new trial would not be authorized for an immaterial variance between the allegations and the proof. Folsom v. Lewis, 85 Ga. 146 (11 S. E. 606). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bales v. Griffin, 59 S.E. 316, 3 Ga. App. 97, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 564 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
59 S.E. 316 (Bales v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodcliff Gin Co. v. Kittles
161 S.E. 119 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)