BALES, DEBRA v. STAFFMARK GROUP, LLC
Opinion
FILED Sep 08, 2026 01:48 AM(CT)
TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY
DEBRA BALES, Docket No. 2025-20-4059 Employee, v. STAFFMARK GROUP, LLC, Employer, State File No. 39874-2025 and ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier. Judge Brian K. Addington
EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
Debra Bales requested temporary disability and medical benefits during an expedited hearing that started on June 2 and continued to August 31, 2026.1 Staffmark claimed that Ms. Bales was not entitled to benefits because she had an idiopathic fall. Based on the evidence, the Court grants her request in part.
Claim History
Two witnesses testified at the hearing: Ms. Bales and Kristy Sims, a coworker.
Ms. Bales’s version of events
Ms. Bales fell on June 12, 2025, her first day of work. Her job consisted of taking rolls of wrapping from pallets to her workstation to affix stickers and then placing them on another pallet. The pallets were a few steps from her workstation. The rolls were wrapped in shrink wrap, which had been cut and laid around the bottom of the pallet and on the floor. As Ms. Bales returned to her station, her foot became entangled in the shrink wrap, and she fell.
1 A subpoenaed witness did not appear on June 2.
Ms. Bales described her fall by stating that her arm went out and hit the table and she hit the floor. She was dazed, and coworkers came to help her. They tried to pick her up, but she dropped to the floor and struck her knee. Later, they were able to place her in a chair. An ambulance was called, and a Staffmark employee rode with her to the hospital. Ms. Bales injured her leg and shoulder. She received medical treatment for her injuries but needs additional treatment.
Ms. Sims’s version of events
Ms. Bales came to her workstation, which was clear of debris. Although pallets were stacked behind the workers, no shrink wrap from them littered the floor. Ms. Sims observed that Ms. Bales stood near her table and then fell to the ground slowly with an outstretched arm striking the table and pushing it forward. She went to Ms. Bales and said that she looked dizzy, and Ms. Bales agreed.
A male coworker, working ten feet from Ms. Bales, ran to her and asserted that she must have tripped over the shrink wrap. Afterward Ms. Bales stated the shrink wrap caused her fall. This man previously settled a worker’s compensation claim, according to Ms. Sims. Later, employees helped Ms. Bales into a chair.
Argument
Ms. Bales argued that a hazard on the floor caught her foot and caused her to fall. She did not just fall for no reason. She requested temporary disability benefits and medical benefits, including payment for past medical treatment.
Staffmark argued that Ms. Bales suffered an idiopathic fall. She was not injured due to a work hazard and is not entitled to benefits.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Ms. Bales must show a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits that she is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50- 6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
The first question is whether Ms. Bales suffered an injury that arose primarily out of her work. The parties agreed that she fell at work but disputed the cause of her fall. Idiopathic injuries are not compensable unless an employment hazard causes
or exacerbates the injury. Phillips v. A&H Constr. Co., 134 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Tenn. 2004). Staffmark presented testimony to prove Ms. Bales’s fall was solely idiopathic.
The Court observed both witnesses, heard their testimony, and reviewed their written statements. The Tennessee Supreme Court gave indicia of witness credibility, so that trial courts consider whether a witness is “calm or agitated, at ease or nervous, self-assured or hesitant, steady or stammering, confident or defensive, forthcoming or deceitful, reasonable or argumentative, honest or biased.” Kelly v. Kelly, 445 S.W.3d 685, 694-695 (Tenn. 2014). Considering the criteria, Ms. Bales was credible, while Ms. Sims appeared nervous, defensive, argumentative, and biased.
Ms. Bales consistently testified that her foot got caught on something, most likely the shrink wrap at her workstation. She did not testify that she just fell, but that the shrink wrap on the floor impeded her foot from moving, causing her fall. Further, she fell into the table and then to the floor and fell again when coworkers tried to help her up. In other words, workplace hazards caused or exacerbated her injuries, and her coworkers were involved in another fall.
In contrast, Ms. Sims’s testimony exaggerated the conditions. She stated Ms.
Bales fell in “slow motion” and that another coworker working just ten feet from Ms. Bales ran to her after she fell. Her testimony is implausible. Also, it was Ms. Sims who suggested to Ms. Bales that she must have been dizzy. Further, Ms. Sims was personally offended or concerned that the man that helped Ms. Bales had previously settled a workers’ compensation claim. However, she never explained how a coworker’s workers’ compensation settlement was relevant to Ms. Bales’s fall, other than coincidence. This suggested bias. She also did not testify about the second fall Ms. Bales suffered when employees tried to help her to a chair.
Ms. Bales provided sufficient evidence to show she is likely to succeed at a hearing on the merits on entitlement to a panel of physicians.
As to past and ongoing temporary disability benefits, the Court finds Ms.
Bales did not present expert medical proof that she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; a causal connection between the injury and her inability to work; and the duration of her disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Her request for temporary disability benefits is denied at this time.
Likewise, because Ms. Bales did not introduce any medical proof or bills showing her treatment was reasonable and necessary for the work injury, the Court denies her request for payment of past medical expenses at this time.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
1. Staffmark shall provide a panel of physicians to Ms. Bales and furnish reasonable, necessary, and related treatment for her injuries under section 50- 6-204(a)(1)(A).
2. Ms. Bales’s request for temporary disability benefits and past medical benefits is denied at this time.
3. A Status Hearing is set for October 29, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
The parties must call 855-543-5044 to participate.
4. Unless an interlocutory appeal is filed, compliance with this order must occur within seven business days of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).
ENTERED September 8, 2026.
Brian K. Addington
JUDGE BRIAN K. ADDINGTON Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
APPENDIX
Exhibits:
1. Affidavit of Debra Bales 2. Declaration of Ms. Sims 3. Employee Incident Report 4. Ms. Sims’s witness report 5. Medical Records (for identification only)2 6. Wage Statement 7. Recording of Ms. Bales and Adjuster.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this order was sent as shown on September 8, 2026.
Name Email Service sent to: Nicholas Dasler, X ndassler@wkfirm.com Employee’s Attorney Stephen Morton, X stephen.morton@mgclaw.com Employer’s Attorney amber.dennis@mgclaw.com
PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
2 Staffmark objected to these records as filed untimely. Ms. Bales responded that Staffmark knew the provider and could obtain them if they wanted. The Court took the matter under advisement. Because they were not filed 15 days before the hearing, the Court sustains the objection. Tenn. Comp. R & Regs. 0800-02-21.15(1) (2026).
Right to Appeal:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BALES, DEBRA v. STAFFMARK GROUP, LLC (BALES, DEBRA v. STAFFMARK GROUP, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.