Balentine v. Reynolds Metals Company and Alcoa
This text of 875 So. 2d 291 (Balentine v. Reynolds Metals Company and Alcoa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the appellees Reynolds Metals Company and Alcoa, Inc., solely on the basis of the opinion by the Court of Civil Appeals in Weaver v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 871 So.2d 814 (Ala.Civ.App.2001). We reversed that decision in Ex parte Weaver, 871 So.2d 820 (Ala.2003). Relying on Weaver (not Ex parte Weaver), the appellees now before us admit, and indeed insist, at pages ii and 42-51 of their brief, that “the material facts of the decision in Weaver are indistinguishable from the facts of the present case.” We there[292]*292fore reverse the summary judgment in favor of Reynolds Metals and Alcoa and remand the cause for further proceedings. t
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
875 So. 2d 291, 2003 Ala. LEXIS 242, 2003 WL 22026383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balentine-v-reynolds-metals-company-and-alcoa-ala-2003.