Baldwinsville State Bank v. Velvit Knit Corp.

245 A.D. 803

Opinion

Judgments and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. (The judgments are for defendants in an action on a promissory note. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwinsville State Bank v. Velvit Knit Corp., 245 A.D. 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

245 A.D. 803 (Baldwinsville State Bank v. Velvit Knit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.