Baldwinsville State Bank v. Velvit Knit Corp.

245 A.D. 803

This text of 245 A.D. 803 (Baldwinsville State Bank v. Velvit Knit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwinsville State Bank v. Velvit Knit Corp., 245 A.D. 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Judgments and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was against the weight of the evidence. (The judgments are for defendants in an action on a promissory note. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D. 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwinsville-state-bank-v-velvit-knit-corp-nyappdiv-1935.