Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. Farmers Reliance Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. Farmers Reliance Mutual Insurance

241 A.D. 798

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding that defendant by its conduct waived requirement of service of verified proof of loss within the terms of the insurance policy is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the opinion of Cunningham, J., at Special Term. [See 151 Misc. 243.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the finding that defendant by its conduct waived requirement of service of verified proof of loss within the terms of the insurance policy is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the opinion of Cunningham, J., at Special Term. [See 151 Misc. 243.]

Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. Farmers Reliance Mutual Insurance, 241 A.D. 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

241 A.D. 798 (Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. Farmers Reliance Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related