Baldwin v. Walls
This text of 23 Cal. App. 349 (Baldwin v. Walls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The notice of appeal specifies that “plaintiff C. S. Baldwin, in the above entitled action, hereby appeals to the supreme court of said state of California, from the order of the superior court of said county of Modoc, sustaining [350]*350defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint in said action. C
It is well settled that such order is not - appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939; Agard v. Valencia, 39 Cal. 292; Ashley v. Olmstead, 54 Cal. 616; Hadsall v. Case, 15 Cal. App. 541, [115 Pac. 330].)
As stated in the Agard case: “The judgment is itself an adjudication upon the demurrer; and it is only from the judgment, and not from the order sustaining the demurrer, that the plaintiff could appeal.”
The purported appeal must be dismissed and it is so ordered.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J. concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Cal. App. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-walls-calctapp-1913.