Baldwin v. Walker
23 N.Y.S. 1149, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 941
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that evidence of Olive D. Walker was improperly received. See Steele v. Ward, 30 Hun, 555; In re Hewitt, 21 Wkly. Dig. 296; Erwin v. Erwin, 54 Hun, 166, 7 N. Y. Supp. 365.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. Walker, 23 N.Y.S. 1149, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 941 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
23 N.Y.S. 1149 (Baldwin v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Probate of Blaine
143 A.D. 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)