Baldwin v. Walker
23 N.Y.S. 1149, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 941
This text of 23 N.Y.S. 1149 (Baldwin v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baldwin v. Walker, 23 N.Y.S. 1149, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 941 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that evidence of Olive D. Walker was improperly received. See Steele v. Ward, 30 Hun, 555; In re Hewitt, 21 Wkly. Dig. 296; Erwin v. Erwin, 54 Hun, 166, 7 N. Y. Supp. 365.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Probate of Blaine
143 A.D. 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 N.Y.S. 1149, 67 Hun 651, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 651, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-walker-nysupct-1893.