Baldwin v. Uniroyal, Inc.

305 S.E.2d 188, 166 Ga. App. 520, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2230
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 4, 1983
Docket65871
StatusPublished

This text of 305 S.E.2d 188 (Baldwin v. Uniroyal, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwin v. Uniroyal, Inc., 305 S.E.2d 188, 166 Ga. App. 520, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2230 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

Pope, Judge.

The issue raised by appellants’ enumeration of error has been decided adversely to them in Hoxie v. Americus Auto. Co., 73 Ga. App. 686 (2) (37 SE2d 808) (1946). Accord, Lindsey v. Samoluk, 236 Ga. 171 (223 SE2d 147) (1976); Parker Plumbing &c. Co. v. Kurtz, 225 Ga. 31 (165 SE2d 729) (1969).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PARKER PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY v. Kurtz
165 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)
Lindsey v. Samoluk
223 S.E.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Hoxie v. Americus Automobile Company
37 S.E.2d 808 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 S.E.2d 188, 166 Ga. App. 520, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-uniroyal-inc-gactapp-1983.