Baldwin v. Tucker
55 A. 1132, 64 N.J. Eq. 333, 19 Dickinson 333, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 204
This text of 55 A. 1132 (Baldwin v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baldwin v. Tucker, 55 A. 1132, 64 N.J. Eq. 333, 19 Dickinson 333, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1902).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is áffirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 412.
[334]*334For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garrets on, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, VpooM—13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Enz v. Bowan
131 A. 159 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
55 A. 1132, 64 N.J. Eq. 333, 19 Dickinson 333, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-tucker-nj-1902.