Baldwin v. Tucker
55 A. 1132, 64 N.J. Eq. 333, 19 Dickinson 333, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 204
Opinion
The decree appealed from is áffirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Emery, whose opinion is reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 412.
[334]*334For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garrets on, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, VpooM—13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. Tucker, 55 A. 1132, 64 N.J. Eq. 333, 19 Dickinson 333, 1901 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1902).
55 A. 1132 (Baldwin v. Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Enz v. Bowan
131 A. 159 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)