Baldwin v. Thibaudeau

New York Court of Common Pleas

Baldwin v. Thibaudeau

14 N.Y.S. 788, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 54, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2496

DecidedJune 1, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.Y.S. 788 (Baldwin v. Thibaudeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Thibaudeau, 14 N.Y.S. 788, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 54, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2496 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is manifest from the return in this case that the time of rendering judgment in this action is erroneously stated, as it appears to be before the return date of the summons. This date being material, and the parties having failed to amend the return by stipulation, the court of its own motion orders the return to be sept back to the justice who tried the case for amendment, and orders a reargument of this cause to be had at the next additional general term, the appellant’s attorney to enter the order and procure the amendment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is manifest from the return in this case that the time of rendering judgment in this action is erroneously stated, as it appears to be before the return date of the summons. This date being material, and the parties having failed to amend the return by stipulation, the court of its own motion orders the return to be sept back to the justice who tried the case for amendment, and orders a reargument of this cause to be had at the next additional general term, the appellant’s attorney to enter the order and procure the amendment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.Y.S. 788, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 54, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-thibaudeau-nyctcompl-1891.