Baldwin v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Baldwin v. Taylor

1 Mart. (N.S.) 598

DecidedSeptember 15, 1823

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mart. (N.S.) 598 (Baldwin v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Taylor, 1 Mart. (N.S.) 598 (La. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. This case has been brought up by the appellee, who requires that the judgment should be affirmed with damages. An inspection of the record convinces us that it was taken solely for the purpose of delay.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with ten per centum damages for the delay.

[599]*599West'n District Sept. 1823. Baldwin for the plaintiff, Johnston for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. This case has been brought up by the appellee, who requires that the judgment should be affirmed with damages. An inspection of the record convinces us that it was taken solely for the purpose of delay.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with ten per centum damages for the delay.

[599]*599West'n District Sept. 1823. Baldwin for the plaintiff, Johnston for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mart. (N.S.) 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-taylor-la-1823.