Baldwin v. State

199 S.W. 458, 82 Tex. Crim. 243, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 334
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 21, 1917·No. No. 4702.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying a pistol, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

There are two troubles in the record which precludes the consideration of the matters presented for revision. The first is, the record does not contain notice of appeal, and, second, there is not found in the transcript an order of the court allowing the filing of statement of facts and bills of exception after the termination of the term of court. Por these reasons the appeal can not be considered, and if it could be, without proper order in the record authorizing the consideration of these matters, they could not be reviewed.

Por the reason indicated, viz: want of notice of appeal, the appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. State, 199 S.W. 458, 82 Tex. Crim. 243, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 334 (Tex. 1917).

199 S.W. 458 (Baldwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. State
463 S.W.2d 18 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)