Baldwin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baldwin v. State

818 So. 2d 639, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7836, 2002 WL 1224965

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-3732

StatusPublished

This text of 818 So. 2d 639 (Baldwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. State, 818 So. 2d 639, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7836, 2002 WL 1224965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raised several claims in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We affirm.

The only claim raised by Appellant that merits discussion is his claim for additional jail credit. Appellant failed to direct the court to portions of the record that would establish an entitlement to that credit. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We therefore affirm the denial of the jail credit claim without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI