Baldwin v. State
818 So. 2d 639, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7836, 2002 WL 1224965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baldwin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 753 So. 2d 573 →
Opinion
Appellant raised several claims in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. We affirm.
The only claim raised by Appellant that merits discussion is his claim for additional jail credit. Appellant failed to direct the court to portions of the record that would establish an entitlement to that credit. See Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We therefore affirm the denial of the jail credit claim without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baldwin v. State, 818 So. 2d 639, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7836, 2002 WL 1224965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
818 So. 2d 639 (Baldwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
714 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)