Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Co.

125 A.D. 912, 109 N.Y.S. 1138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D. 441

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Co., 125 A.D. 912, 109 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

125 A.D. 912 (Baldwin v. Schenectady Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.