Baldwin v. Roman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Baldwin v. Roman

126 Ala. 266

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedNovember 15, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 126 Ala. 266 (Baldwin v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Roman, 126 Ala. 266 (Ala. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

MoCLLELAN, C. J.

There was no final judgment against Baldwin, the garnishee, in the court below, and his appeal must be dismissed for want of such judgment to support it, in response to the motion to that end, made in behalf of the appellee.

The rulings of the circuit court in the garnishment proceedings, if they ever result in injury to the garnishee, may be reviewed on appeal; a remedy that will be entirely adequate to correct any errors that may have been committed to his hurt; and upon this ground the application for mavdamns must be denied.

Appeal dismissed and application for mandamus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MoCLLELAN, C. J.

There was no final judgment against Baldwin, the garnishee, in the court below, and his appeal must be dismissed for want of such judgment to support it, in response to the motion to that end, made in behalf of the appellee.

The rulings of the circuit court in the garnishment proceedings, if they ever result in injury to the garnishee, may be reviewed on appeal; a remedy that will be entirely adequate to correct any errors that may have been committed to his hurt; and upon this ground the application for mavdamns must be denied.

Appeal dismissed and application for mandamus denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 Ala. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-roman-ala-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack