Baldwin v. Roman

126 Ala. 266
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MoCLLELAN, C. J.

There was no final judgment against Baldwin, the garnishee, in the court below, and his appeal must be dismissed for want of such judgment to support it, in response to the motion to that end, made in behalf of the appellee.

The rulings of the circuit court in the garnishment proceedings, if they ever result in injury to the garnishee, may be reviewed on appeal; a remedy that will be entirely adequate to correct any errors that may have been committed to his hurt; and upon this ground the application for mavdamns must be denied.

Appeal dismissed and application for mandamus denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. Roman, 126 Ala. 266 (Ala. 1899).

126 Ala. 266 (Baldwin v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chamberlain v. Mobile Fish & Oyster Co.
137 Ala. 187 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)