Baldwin v. Rice
91 N.Y.S. 1086
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 6, 1905
StatusPublished
This text of 91 N.Y.S. 1086 (Baldwin v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baldwin v. Rice, 91 N.Y.S. 1086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
The judgment should be affirmed, on so much of the opinion of the court below as holds that the plaintiffs have no standing in court to maintain this action; but the judgment should not have been upon the merits. Judgment modified, by striking out “on the merits,” and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 N.Y.S. 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-rice-nyappdiv-1905.