Baldwin v. Prouty
13 Johns. 430
This text of 13 Johns. 430 (Baldwin v. Prouty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baldwin v. Prouty, 13 Johns. 430 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).
Opinion
The judgment was a good ground of sef-offj, and the evidence offered of the existence of that judgment was the best that the nature of the case would admit. The justice, therefore, erred in rejecting the evidence, and the judgment ought to be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fitzgibbon v. Brown
43 Me. 169 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1857)
Wentworth v. Keizer
33 Me. 367 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1851)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 Johns. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-prouty-nysupct-1816.