Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong

DecidedMarch 12, 1999

Docket01A01-9804-CV-00195

StatusPublished

This text of Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong (Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. Pirelli Armstrong, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED March 12, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr. SCOTT BALDWIN, J. L. SMITH, and ) Appellate Court Clerk KEVIN T. BROWN, individually and ) on behalf of a class of individuals ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9804-CV-00195 VS. ) ) Davidson Circuit PIRELLI ARMSTRONG TIRE ) No. 95C-3232 CORPORATION, UNITED RUBBER, ) CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC ) WORKERS OF AMERICA, AND ) URW LOCAL UNION 670, ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )

ORDER ON PETITIONS TO REHEAR

Pirelli and the Union defendants have filed petitions to rehear. We have

decided that the petitions are without merit and should be denied.

It is, therefore, ordered that both petitions to rehear be denied.

______________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, PRESIDING JUDGE, M.S.

______________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

______________________________________ WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI