Baldwin v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co.
This text of 24 Jones & S. 607 (Baldwin v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only evidence of negligence was a release which defendant received from plaintiff. A point was sought to be raised which was not taken below. The Court held (Per Curiam) “ that the release was not an admission of liability; that on appeal the court could only examine the action of the court below upon matters actually presented on the trial; and affirmed the judgment.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Jones & S. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-new-york-central-h-r-r-r-co-nysuperctnyc-1888.