Baldwin v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co.

24 Jones & S. 607
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided October 25, 1888·Published

Opinion

The only evidence of negligence was a release which defendant received from plaintiff. A point was sought to be raised which was not taken below. The Court held (Per Curiam) “ that the release was not an admission of liability; that on appeal the court could only examine the action of the court below upon matters actually presented on the trial; and affirmed the judgment.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 24 Jones & S. 607 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

24 Jones & S. 607 (Baldwin v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.