Baldwin v. Morgan

73 Miss. 276
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cooper, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellee’s claim against appellant was not upon open account, but upon a contract of employment by the month at a fixed and definite sum. The affidavit contained as full information as could be given by filing an independent paper. The claim did not consist of “items,” and therefore an “itemized account” could not be filed. An item is an article; a separate particular in an account. Webster’s Dictionary.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. Morgan, 73 Miss. 276 (Mich. 1895).

73 Miss. 276 (Baldwin v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hannan Motor Co. v. DARR
56 So. 2d 64 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Fairfield v. Foster
214 P. 319 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1923)